Comments on: What is the best photogrammetry software in 2025?  https://www.3dmag.com/reviews/photogrammetry-software/what-is-the-best-photogrammetry-software-in-2025/ 3D Mag — Explore the World of 3D Printing and Scanning with Latest News and Reviews Wed, 16 Apr 2025 12:37:47 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2 By: 3D Master 007 https://www.3dmag.com/reviews/photogrammetry-software/what-is-the-best-photogrammetry-software-in-2025/#comment-39534 Tue, 15 Apr 2025 16:32:49 +0000 https://www.3dmag.com/?p=9352#comment-39534 Hey, surprised not to see Meshroom mentioned here! It’s free, open-source, and honestly one of the best entry points for anyone curious about photogrammetry without wanting to spend a fortune. Any reason it didn’t make the list? Feels like a solid option for hobbyists and indie creators.

]]>
By: Si Mon https://www.3dmag.com/reviews/photogrammetry-software/what-is-the-best-photogrammetry-software-in-2025/#comment-39532 Tue, 15 Apr 2025 16:26:28 +0000 https://www.3dmag.com/?p=9352#comment-39532 Yeah, I hear you — and I actually agree to an extent. Dedicated photogrammetry software companies definitely have the edge when it comes to specialization and maturity. But at the same time, I wouldn’t completely write Artec off just yet.

They may be new to standalone photogrammetry, but they’ve been building software for years to support their high-end scanners. That means they’re not starting from scratch — they already have solid experience in mesh processing, 3D modeling, and building tools for capturing geometry. Add to that a healthy budget and a strong R&D track record, and you’ve got at least the potential for a competitive product.

Of course, time will tell — I’m not claiming Artec Studio will take over the space. But I do think it’ll be interesting to see how it evolves, especially if they continue investing in AI and improving accessibility for users beyond their hardware ecosystem.

]]>
By: Anonymous https://www.3dmag.com/reviews/photogrammetry-software/what-is-the-best-photogrammetry-software-in-2025/#comment-39530 Tue, 15 Apr 2025 16:21:28 +0000 https://www.3dmag.com/?p=9352#comment-39530 In reply to Si Mon.

That’s a fair point, and it’s definitely interesting to see Artec stepping into photogrammetry. But I’m a bit skeptical about how much traction they’ll actually get. At the end of the day, companies that focus solely on photogrammetry software – like RealityCapture or Agisoft – have been optimizing for this specific use case for years. Their development cycles, UI decisions, and feature sets are entirely shaped by that focus.

With Artec, I can’t help but think photogrammetry is more of an add-on to their core business, which is hardware. It’s hard to imagine their software getting the same level of attention and polish as tools built by teams who live and breathe photogrammetry full-time. Sure, AI features are a nice touch, but whether it’ll be enough to compete long-term is another question. They might win over a few users, but I doubt they’ll capture a significant share of the market.

]]>
By: Si Mon https://www.3dmag.com/reviews/photogrammetry-software/what-is-the-best-photogrammetry-software-in-2025/#comment-39529 Tue, 15 Apr 2025 16:16:03 +0000 https://www.3dmag.com/?p=9352#comment-39529 Honestly, I’ve used RealityCapture for a few months now, and while it has powerful features, I think its learning curve and occasional UI issues really limit its potential for new users. It feels like the software was designed with pros in mind, but lacks the accessibility that tools like Zephyr or even Metashape offer right out of the gate. The Unreal Engine integration is great if you’re in that ecosystem, but otherwise it’s not a game-changer.

What really caught my attention in this article was Artec Studio showing up as a new player in the photogrammetry space. It’s interesting to see a big name in 3D scanning expanding into this area. Until now, it didn’t really make sense to look at Artec Studio unless you owned one of their high-cost 3d scanners – and that’s a pretty big investment. But now that they’ve introduced AI-driven photogrammetry and support for standard photo/video input, it opens the door to a much wider user base. Definitely curious to test it out and see how it performs compared to more established options.

]]>
By: Julia Anders https://www.3dmag.com/reviews/photogrammetry-software/what-is-the-best-photogrammetry-software-in-2025/#comment-39528 Tue, 15 Apr 2025 16:08:54 +0000 https://www.3dmag.com/?p=9352#comment-39528 Has anyone tried using 3DF Zephyr for large-scale projects? Wondering how well it performs compared to Metashape in terms of speed and accuracy.

]]>
By: Marco Hsu https://www.3dmag.com/reviews/photogrammetry-software/what-is-the-best-photogrammetry-software-in-2025/#comment-39527 Tue, 15 Apr 2025 16:08:32 +0000 https://www.3dmag.com/?p=9352#comment-39527 I’m curious – how does Artec Studio’s AI photogrammetry compare to RealityCapture when working with complex outdoor environments?

]]>
By: Sarah McIntyre https://www.3dmag.com/reviews/photogrammetry-software/what-is-the-best-photogrammetry-software-in-2025/#comment-39526 Tue, 15 Apr 2025 16:07:47 +0000 https://www.3dmag.com/?p=9352#comment-39526 Great article! Super helpful for anyone looking to get started with photogrammetry or compare the top tools out there.

]]>